![]() | ![]() |
|
If the '80s was a decade characterized by big corporations, slick
packaging, and Phil Collins' shining forehead, the '90s seem to be
experiencing a resurgence in the grass-roots, do-it-yourself ethics
that empower the little man and woman to get out and put their
creative thumb prints on the world. The music industry is hardly
immune to this climate, and as a result, small labels have been
springing up like lemonade stands in a suburban heat wave. Some are
started by artist managers who want to organize the talent around
them into a viable company; others by studio owners or producers
wanting to expand their operations by developing their own indy label
towards securing a production deal with a larger company; and the
vast majority are started by artists themselves seeking to develop
their musical product towards professionally presenting themselves to
the music industry. There are four factors contributing to the indy
label res urgence today and each one is a door of opportunity for
anyone who can offer good music, basic business smarts and a load of
perserverance.
When rock'n'roll exploded on the scene in the mid-50s, major
labels scorned it and so basement concerns like Chess and Sun made
fortunes; likewise no one saw a buck in disco except Casablanca and
millions were made. More recently rap, and to a lesser extent reggae,
illustrate the same story. Why is this the case?
Major record labels are too large and ponderous to be in a
position to discover and nurture great music and talent. Independents
world-wide have been, and will continue to be, the life blood of the
music industry. As a result, most significant musical trends have had
their birth in independent companies.
The Billboard charts for the last few years show an interesting,
if not surprising, trend. Thanks to the installation of point-of-sale
systems at most major music chain retailers, SoundScan's co mputers
can poll music stores and get the exact number of each title sold
(prior to SoundScan it was done by a highly corruptible method of
polling music chains, wholesalers and independent record stores.
Apparently lots of totals were "bought"). Here are the new results.
In 1990 there were no independent labels ranked among the top 20
labels with titles on The Billboard 200. By '91, three indie labels
had entered the top 20 list, and among them placed 19 separate titles
on The Billboard 200 and represented 5.1% of the label chart share.
By 1992, the number of indie labels occupying places in the top 20
had increased from three to four but, more importantly, they
represented 34 titles (an 80% increase) and 5.9% (a 16% increase) of
the label chart share. The trend is even more dramatic if we look at
Billboard's Top R&B; Albums chart where chart share doubled
between 1990 and 1992 to a total of 22.2%! Each year since '92, the
indie distribution has been grabbing more and more market and chart
share. This year (1996) finds them second only to WEA
(Warner/Elektra/Atlantic). The major labels today act more like film
distributors than production houses. They have the organization and
capital to take new music to the public, but little ability to create
the music themselves. "While the majors want to sell music like
McDonalds sells hamburgers, we'd rather be a small chain of gourmet
restaurants with a line going around the block," says founder of indy
label Alligator Records Bruce Iglauer. "It's the menu that
counts--not how many are served." Independent labels are once again
artisically and creatively on the cutting-edge of the new music. This
new music is not a fad but, in fact, is the fastest-growing segment
of the music market. It includes everything from rap, urban and
alternative to country, world and folk.
This is not to set up a false dichotomy of goodies and baddies
(independent companies and adventurous musicians vs. the
multinationals and flavor of the month club). There are still plenty
of struggles and contradictions between these two groups but
increasingly we are seeing a pattern of symbiosis emerge where one
can help the other, a fair deal can be struck, and both can profit.
Indies are highly valued as the testing ground for the superstars of
tomarrow.
Growing market segmentation by music style is another significant
one for independent labels. Rock's share of music sales, so long the
mainstay of pop music, has plunged 27% since 1987 alone, to about 32%
of the total. This new musical diversity is even reflected in the
Grammy awards. Started in 1959 with a mere 28 categories, this year
the number was up to 83.
A rapidly segmenting music market means more opportunity for
independents whose releases detail the richness of particular or
"niche" musical forms: the blues of Black Top and Alligator, the rap
of Priority and Ruffhouse, the industrial dance meshes of Nettwerk
and Wax Trax, the world folk of Triloka, the rock'n'roll of Touch
'n'Go; the list goes on and on. All began out of a love for a cetain
style of music; a style the majors didn't want anything to do with
initially.
These companies didn't simply find a niche and fill it-- as so
many lesser new age and "fuzak" labels do. Nor did they just concoct
one and market it, like so many major-label-forged "alternative"
indies. They usually developed their label along with the music they
presented,often as a hobby, bringing bands and artists to an ardent
audience and then riding the crest of their influence. For a number
of the smarter ones, yesterday's hobby has become today's goldmine.
Recent years have witnessed a trend toward consolidation in both
music distribution and retail that will likely continue. In
distribution, the old system-- where indie labels assigned their
product lines to a different regional distributor in each market-- is
changing to one where a single distributor handles a label on a
nationwide basis.
The consolidation of retail into megastores during the last five
years is a reality in most consumer goods. Music has been no
different. That development, coupled with significant merger and
acquisition activity, has resulted in an overwhelming percentage of
the music business being conducted by a small number of large chains.
In other words, by linking up with key national distributors
independents can potentially reach approximately 90% of the U.S.
record-buying public! The building blocks are all in place.
But record retail is only part of the story (albeit the largest
part). Independents have long known that the best way to reach their
niche audiences most effectively is to go directly to them through
the mail. Direct marketing of music accounts for about 10% of overall
sales in the U.S. for major labels but up to 50%of sales for
independents! Other record retail alternatives include bookstores,
record clubs, specialty gift stores, TV home shoping, digital
interactive TV and even vending machines.
But probably the greatest threat to traditional record retail will
arrive through computers. Digital transmission of music via power
line and satellite is poised to transform the recording industry as
we know it. On-line opportunities for independent labels are
multiplying rapidly and levelling a playing field that was decidedly
tilted in favor of larger companies. "The accelerating trend", says
Davitt Sigerson, president of Polydor, " is putting much more control
in the hands of the public, and much less control in the hands of the
tastemakers and gatekeepers." The majors see it coming and many are
worried.
Robin Hood would approve of what the purveyors of office equipment
are doing these days: making powerful technologies affordable for
rich and not so rich alike. They're giving small businesses the same
tools and resources to which only large organizations once had
access. And prices are plummeting! Today you can set up a modern
office with computer , laser printer, copier, fax board and all
necessary software for under $2,500! (call me for details).
And prices are not all that are falling. What began as a trickle
of high-end technology to the economy segment of the market has
swelled to a flood of deluxe features now commonly available on
low-cost machines. Upgradable computers, sophisticated voice-mail
systems, and full-featured copiers and faxes are now available at
prices that used to buy you only no-frills technology.
What all this hardware and software will give you is the look and
efficiency of a professional businessperson, and, in the end, save
you tons of time, money and energy. The extraordinary strides made
during the last five years in information gathering and communication
enables even the smallest record company to obtain, analyze, and
utilize sales and consumer data that are equal to that obtainable by
large branch distributors and labels.
On a more basic level, these tools can help you manage projects,
design your marketing communications, set agendas, track your
schedule, build mailing lists, network coast to coast, keep records,
print labels and generally assist you in maximizing your resources as
a small independent label.
O.K., these are the factors making it an opportune time to start
and grow your own indy label. But opportunity alone does not equal
success . As mentioned at the start of this article, great music,
business smarts and a load of perserverance are also required. Do you
have what it takes? Check it out.
Great Music. Don't even think of starting a label without great
music. This may be your own music or that of bands and songwriters
you know. Just be sure you've gotten enough feedback to know you're
on to something special. How do you get this feedback? Ask! Get input
from at least ten people you respect on what makes you or your
artists different from others. Write a summary of the best original
qualities, and try to think of ways you can enhance them. Originality
is an all-important key to succcess. Look for it and, when you find
it, nurture it.
Business Smarts. Starting your own indy label is probably the
ultimate entrepreneurial venture and, as such, demands a good amount
of business know-how. Any skills you can acquire in project planning,
bookeeping, marketing, product development, writing, contract
negotiation and office management will go a long way toward insuring
your label's success. Organizations like the Small Business
Administration can be very helpful to young business start-ups in
need of resources and information.
Apart from the music, money will be the most important ingredient
in launching your label. Some start their labels on a shoestring and
end up very successful. But most ventures will require a minimum
capital outlay of $10 to $20,000. Anything less and you're shooting
yourself in the foot before the race begins. Banks and investors will
be reluctant to capitalize such a risky venture but a
well-thought-out business plan (and a good credit rating!) could make
the difference in garnnering the support you'll need. If you're a
woman or a minority your chances of otaining a loan are much greater.
Look into grant opportunities too. Alot of grant money goes unclaimed
each year and your chances are as good as anyone else's!
As a one-man or one-woman record company executive, you should be
prepared at the beginning to wear many different hats. Take stock of
your strengths and weaknesses, and those of any partners you may
have. Starting your company will be the easy part. Keeping it going
will require long days and even longer nights. It will mean learning
how to be a self-starter, taking risks, being creative, being calm
amidst chaos, and taking responsibility for your actions and
decisions.
It's the rare artist who can function alone and effectively as
business person without some conflict with their creative side. This
is because the very qualities that make one the most sought after
writer, producer or musician may spell diff iculties when applied to
running a business. This is not to imply that business cannot be
conducted creatively. It can and it should be. It simply means that
the artist needs to strike a balance between the two and, perhaps,
consider teaming up with a partner who can contribute to those tasks
the artist needs help with. If at all possible, the roles each
individual will play should be clearly defined IN ADVANCE with as
little ambiguity or overlap as possible.
Perserverance. If you're planning on starting your own record
label you will hopefully be thinking long-term. Overnight success is
extremely rare in this business. Persistence and holding onto your
unique vision are the golden keys that will often unlock future
rewards.
It's important to remember that artists who are charting and
labels that are "suddenly" news have usually been plying their
respective trades a long time without fanfare. Joseph Brooks could
have given up after the song he believed in was rejected three times,
twenty times, fifty times, a hundred and thirteen times(!). It was
only on the hundred and fourteenth attempt that a music publisher saw
his song's hit potential and "You Light Up My Life" went to #1 on the
pop charts in 1977, earned a Grammy award, and made Joe Brooks a
multi-millionaire.
Brian Epstein had a vision but every record company in Britain,
save one, passed on the Beatles. He stuck to it, picked himself up
after each rejection, and finally landed a deal with EMI. The rest is
history. Persistance and vision are the energizing factors common to
both. Trend analyst John Naisbett's new book, "Global Paradox" (Wm.
Morrow & Co., 1994), has a provocative subtitle that has some
relevance to this topic: " The Bigger the World Economy, the More
Powerful its Smallest Players". Our world has become friendlier to
small business. The climate is right. With the right combination of
talent, information and energy you too can become a powerful player
in an industry dependent on small companies for tomorrow's sounds.
by Peter Spellman
Director of Career Development at Berklee College of Music, Boston, and author of The Self-Promoting Musician: Do-it-Yourself Strategies for Independent Music Success (Berklee Press). You can find him at Music Business Solutions.
Copyright © 1999 - 2003 MUSIC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, all rights reserved. Text, graphics, and HTML code are protected by US and International Copyright Laws, and may not be copied, reprinted, published, translated, hosted, or otherwise distributed by any means without explicit permission.
Music Biz Insight | Articles | MBS Books | About Us |